Would love your thoughts, please comment. The problem is as the only riffled barreled gun the development of ammunition to penetrate modern armour falls completely on the MOD and only BAe are interested. Before we look at it’s performance stats, what really is a Challenger 2 and why does it exist? The US is replacing the Abrams turbine engines with diesels--so a draw. Challenger 2 is a third generation MBT, the same generation as the Russian T-80 & T-90, German Leopard 2 and US M1 Abrams. © 2014-2019 UK Defence Journal, all rights reserved. The Challenger has NBC systems fitted as standard the Abrams does not. Challenger 2 has a better main turrent gun and a better engine. Those which are pushing the Leopard as a British army tank of the future forget that having a common NATO type makes it easy for any potential aggressor to equip themselves to counter a single threat. And then there's the electronics. Favorite Answer. That said, the Challenger is no slouch in Close quarters either, the Chobham/Dorchester mark 2 armour is among the best in the world and has been known to take beatings that have put M!a2s out of action. The commander has a panoramic gyrostabilised sight with laser rangefinder as well as eight periscopes giving 360 degree vision. It also incorporates a newer APFSDS round and a Mulitpurpose anti-tank projectile (MPAT). Lv 5. HOME. 2:49. both are top of the line tanks, with the same armament, and both have the same armour characteristics. Ok, i know these threads have been posted before, but i wanted to talk about these tanks. The hesh rounds have a much longer range (up to 5 miles further) than APFSDS and are much more effective against buildings as well as thinner skinned vehicles. I'm sure these test have been done but money, polltics and undertable deals cause final decisions before production takes place.--troops are never asked for opinions ---[a 1st Cav.div. And the M1 Abrams is a fancy gadgeted piece of crap. Challenger 2 has been bought by two – the UK and Oman. dsm37127. NATO is still A Thing. Like Challeger 2 APFSDS rounds are used. Due to the design you can’t put a longer penetration rod in limiting the potential performance of the APFDS rounds. The best way to decide is to take a look at the facts; 1 x 50in Machine Gun, 2 x 7.62 Machine Guns. The best answer to your question would be to put those in question side by side and put them through the most strengent exercise you can imagine they would encounter in battle and weigh the difference including types of fuel, consumption. Abrams is faster and good for tank vs tank battles. Yea, it is fuel inefficient but with its massive tank it has the capacity to go out and reach. The services are much more interested in APC's and lighting fast attack vehicles for infantry, few tanks can operate in tight neighborhoods like those found in Iraq. During conflict it can also have even more armour added with Explosive Reactive armour kits and additional bar armour can also be fitted. Critically speaking- 2 mpg is shocking. lepoard 2 is rubbish, sides… Read more ». Get answers by asking now. The Abrahms tank is better for large scale clashes and tank battles. Lv 6. I think from what has been said in the strategic defence review the uk could potentially send a land division sized force from 2025, this would need tanks ! All this gives it a maximum speed on road of 36mph and 25mph off road. No? BY DECADE. There presents as a visual deterrent still works especially, when deployed within cities to dissuade unruly elements. Other features include a thermal sleeve, fume extraction and and an all electric stabilisation. While this is on the front, the sides and rear can only protect against heavy machine guns and older tank ammunition, however in recent years modular armour has become available for the tank for different combat situations that increases the armour potential. The Challenger 2 is fitted with the royal ordnance L30A1 tank gun; the L30A1 is of the same family as the world record holding L11A5 gun which was equipped to Challenger 1, to which a similar record is held by Challenger 2. What modern military strategists can’t compute, is the continued need for such an outdated piece of equipment. It is totally unserviceable with commercially available maintainence equipment- engine can only be removed with factory tools. The Challenger 2, M1 and T-90 were designed for 3 different users with often vastly different operational doctrines and performance requirements. Given the fact that M1 Abrams will very probably get one of the most Advanced ammo developped for the L7 which should not put if far behind Chally, Keiler and T64 in terms of firepower while having superior armor and mobility compared to the challenger 1 (abrams composite also covers the LFP unlike the Chally 1) i'd say the M1 abrams is actually the best here. The M1 Abrams is a third-generation American main battle tank designed by Chrysler Defense (now General Dynamics Land Systems). The Leopard 2A6 uses a very similar gun to the Abrams, the L55 which is slightly longer. The range of Challenger 2 has recently been stated as 550km by the British Army, this is however only on road. 4.The British crews are the best in the world. Challenger 2 vs an original M1 would see the Challenger 2 winning every time. Mephisto. Word gets round if equipment is good and other countries tend to buy it. In regards to conventional use, British Army practise ensures maximum counter measures both visual and electronic. I'd say the Challenger has the advantage right off the bat, there's a good chance that the Challenger will be in effective range before the Abrams is prepared to fire. The FV4034 Challenger 2 is a British main battle tank (MBT) currently in service with the armies of the United Kingdom and Oman. That may put the M1 series on top. Benjamin. But overall Challenger 2 is better. Did not think so. NEW CHALLENGER to Leopard 2 and Abrams Tanks Russian T 90MS Main Battle Tank. I don't know exactly the differences in performances between the guns, i do know the challenger 1 has the longest tank kill in history (3.1 miles) if that makes a point. Triple C Ace. BY TYPE. Leopard 2 vs M1 Abrams-Battle Tanks. rest of army is t80 t 90, both poor to infantry as they lost over 200 in chetchen? Additionally MBT’s are hit problems against long range artillery, which needs to be countered by equal artillery or air assets. They both have the same armour - chobhams manufactured in the UK. After Tiger vs Abrams video, some of you still request to see another WW2 vs Modern tank scenario. Abrams (M1/IPM1) is better for speed 45mph vs 37mph. The M1 Abrams, is a little heavier than the Leopard, coming in at 62.6 tons. History. The Challenger 2 is fitted with a Perkins 26.6 litre Diesel engine which has 1200bhp. Since their inception, tanks are becoming tougher, faster, and more easily able to damage the weapons that penetrate – or attempt to penetrate -- them. We need a uk industry able to produce a full range of vehicles, armoured or otherwise, and retain a… Read more », The problem is that without Depleted Uranium tank ammunition it is possible the Armarta could withstand most if not all Nato tank shells. Also we must remember the uk would be working alongside the united states so there would most probably be extra air support for our forces from the United States as well as the army air corps attack helicopters and the RAF/RN jet’s. Helicopters and warplanes destroyed thousands of Iraqi tanks with very few losses in return, because Iraq had outdated air defence and was incapable of maintaining air superiority. 2) probably the Challenger, in the first gulf war 2 M1's engaged a Challenger 2 in a friendly fire accident, the M1's fired 8 depleted uranium rounds at just over 1000 yards range and only dented the Challenger. The L30 is 120mm in diameter and 55-calibers long, made from high tech steel with a chromium alloy lining. This engine is also diesel powered but has multifuel capability. Are you able to guess the thgird ‘main part’ of a tank yet? ... Technology aside bot the Abrams and Challenger share about the same power, munitions, armor and weapons systems. I believe it’s a mistake to rely totally on equipment from other powers. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. Abrams is faster and good for tank vs tank battles. Why won't Democrats join me in getting Biden to close many of our Military bases around the world and get out of these senseless wars..? Both have Chobham armor, 120mm gun (M1's smoothbore, Challenger 2 rifled), good mobility, laser rangefinder, etc. The Challenger is powered by a very compact fuel efficient diesel engine. leopard 2 mate! However the Challenger can't be exported because of it's armour being classifed. Given the fact that M1 Abrams will very probably get one of the most Advanced ammo developped for the L7 which should not put if far behind Chally, Keiler and T64 in terms of firepower while having superior armor and mobility compared to the challenger 1 (abrams composite also covers the LFP unlike the Chally 1) i'd say the M1 abrams is actually the best here. The Abrams … The comparison between two awesome models, as requested by Achintya Prasad. on firepower,armour. 6 Answers. Furthermore Abrams is also fitted with hunter killer optics. That would be the determining factor in which is best with relatively equal machines. It was designed and built by the British company Vickers Defence Systems (now known as BAE System… COUNTRIES. Abrams is faster and good for tank vs tank battles. Lol what? History. I mean the united states Abrams tanks were largely built in the 80's. The three principal Western main battle tanks — the Abrams, the German Leopard 2 and the British Challenger 2 — share many design elements … Similarly the Abrams is fitted with a ballistic fire control computer that uses user and system input to work out lead angle, ammunition type and range. But overall Challenger 2 is better. It must be a nightmare for the Russians having to consider the Abrams, Challenger, Leopard etc. Source(s): https://shrinke.im/a7YsF. Regardless, tanks are only good for so much in today's "war on terror". They do not have Active Protection Systems to take down incoming missiles or rockets. While the gunner is engaging the target the commander designates another, when the original target is destroyed the turret turns automatically and the process begins again. I do know that the British are curently considering the l55 for their Challenger 2. But i think we have become a bit more careful about handing secrets over to America after the issue with movable control surfaces after WW2. Answer Save. 8 Answers. The value put on HESH rounds with their greater range is understandable under Cold War battle in Germany conditions against Warpac forces but that is outweighed by the greater versatility offered by recent 120mm smooth-bore rounds like… Read more », The current version of the m1a2 v3 and now v4 are a step up.the v4 will have an active protection system,most likely isreals.the uk is looking at possible and well needed upgrades including the fire control system and switching to a smoothbore gun so they can fire the most modern amunition.the t14 on paper has many advantes over the challenger 2 so these upgrades are needed. Playing next. Social Media and Comment Moderation Policy, First female officer to lead Division-level Command, Turkey takes charge of NATO high readiness force, 5,000 troops deployed for UK COVID-19 response, Royal Marines ‘shoot down’ US Marine Corps Cobra gunships, What to expect when going for the COVID19 vaccine, China warns UK against sending carrier to South China Sea, NATO jets intercept ‘hundreds’ of Russian aircraft in 2020. The MBT is as relevant now as its always been, hence the urgency to build new ones to counter Russia’s latest creation. And Challenger can fire HEAT rounds. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous. M1A2 Abrams VS Challenger 2 Thread starter Thors Hammer; Start date Sep 11, 2005; Thors Hammer. MANUFACTURERS. Logistically UK… Read more ». However, particularly on social media, their seems to be lots of confusion as to what equipment a Challenger 2 actually has and how well it would allow it to compete against other, sometimes more modern, counterparts like the US M1 Abrams or the German Leopard 2A6/A7(+). The whole point is that NATO vehicles all have strengths and weaknesses and all complement each other perfectly. The T-90s prime mover is the B-92C Diesel engine which produces 1000 hp. Chobham was such an improvement that it was soon used on the new U.S. M1 Abrams main battle tank (MBT) as well. offensive. -can cobble together a makeshift widely commercially available power plant if need arose. Still have questions? How many Mark IV's to take out an M1 Abrams: Military History: Mar 3, 2020: T-14 vs. M1 Abrams: Military History: Jan 22, 2017: M1 Abrams is aging ... Military History: Dec 29, 2016: M1 Abrams, Leopard 2, Challenger 2, T-90: Military History: Oct 24, 2014 Are most people in the US air force pilots? The key differences were that the Leopard 2 … This is the only gun fitted to a NATO tank that is rifled. lastly the Abrams operational range is depressing and will stay that way until the new one comes out. Abrams over tek and expensive and the fuel efficiency of a very inefficient thing!! Basically it saps heavily on the maintainance, supply and logistics arms which could be better implemented in a reservist mode. In comparison the M1A2 Abrams is equipped with a 120mm L/44 M256A1 smoothbore gun of which 42 rounds can be carried. Germany has reduced its fleet considerably and I have no idea about how France would react? The fire control systems in the T-90 and Leopard 26 are very similar to that of both Challenger 2 and the M1A2. I still believe the MBT is a vital element as witnessed in Iraq. Jun 19, 2014 - Here it is! Differing again is the Leopard 2A6 which has core spaced armour and composite armour rumoured to be based off Chobham armour. This goes through an 8 speed gear box (6 fwd, 2rev.). Challenger 2 has a better main turrent gun and a better engine. Main armament: GIAT CN120-26/52 120mm tank gun: L30A1 120 mm rifled gun with 58 rounds: Engine: 8-cylinder diesel SACM 1,100 kW (1,500 hp) Perkins CV-12 V12 diesel 26 litre Is it possible COVID-19 is actually a weapon used for biological warfare? A jet turbine is a magnet for IR weapons. So we pay through the nose for Tank Ammunition. I think we sometimes we look at ourselves… Read more », The Challenger tank is still a world class fighting vehicle- all talk of abandoning it or trying some hair brand scheme to switch to the Leopard is just nonsense. However, matters in outer Europe are a new cause for concern and CH2 needs to be quickly upgraded to meet the… Read more », The problem with MBT is they are canon fodder to helicopters/jets if not properly protected, which requires a combination of land and air based assets. But when the new tier is added … If for any reason our air protection gets pulled away or overstretched, we are extremely lacking. The Challenger 2 is the third vehicle of this name, the first being the A30 Challenger, a World War II design using the Cromwell tank chassis with a 17-pounder gun. great question. Even IF the Challenger was...there are WAY more Abrams. Even with a modern engine, the tank only has a maximum speed of 30mph. Main armament: Mkek120 mm 55 caliber smoothbore gun: 120 mm Rheinmetall L55 smoothbore gun: Engine: Multi-fuel 1,500 hp: MTU-12-cylinder-Diesel engine MB 873-Ka 501 What are the odds of an upcoming cival war? The ne story i love about the Challenger 2 is in one combat threater it was hit by 70 RPG's, carried on, drove to base after and was only out of action for 48 hours. Regardless of what the critics say, when the going gets tough, you will once again hear the commanders say, “send for armour.”, hesh 5 mile range. Up to the challenge of reviewing a tank? Challenger 2 has a better main turrent gun and a better engine. failing that the challenger. For this comparison we will mainly focus on what the Challenger 2 is equipped with and will compare the equipment to the US M1A2 Abrams, the German Leopard 2A6 and the Russian T-90. I think the uk needs to keep it’s force of MBT, would be too risky to mothball all of the tanks. Though I don’t in anyway condemn the then government’s priorities, conventional land weapons such as the CH2 and AS90’s had little if any upgrade apart from a few demonstration vehicles. Leopard 2 vs M1 Abrams vs Challenger 2 Tanks: Which Tank Is Better At Crushing Cars?Leopard 2 vs M1 Abrams vs Challenger 2 Tanks: Which Tank Is Better? How many Mark IV's to take out an M1 Abrams: Military History: Mar 3, 2020: T-14 vs. M1 Abrams: Military History: Jan 22, 2017: M1 Abrams is aging ... Military History: Dec 29, 2016: M1 Abrams, Leopard 2, Challenger 2, T-90: Military History: Oct 24, 2014 The M1 has a superb gunnery record from exercises and battle. Which tank would you feel more secured, and which one would be more powerful on the battlefield. Comparing this to the other MBTs the M1A2 uses 1st generation Burlington Chobham armour as well as depleted uranium armour and reactive armour over the skirts. Rheinmatall the manufacturer have also developed an upgrade that allows the gun to fire anti-tank guided missiles. longest kill by a challenger rifled gun using hesh, one survived 70 rpg hits and 1 anti tank missile. In truth, it never went away and remained as the elephant in the room. The FV4034 Challenger 2, is the UKs Main Battle Tank and operates across the globe from exercises with allied countries to theatres of war like Iraq. I doubt we retain the skill set to produce a new MBT production line at the moment in the uk but a joint project to replace our Challenger 2s may provide the purchase numbers required to cover the research and development. Name: M1 Abrams FV4034 Challenger 2; Type: Main battle tank: Main battle tank: Origin: USA: United Kingdom: Produced: 1980: 1998: Unit cost: 8.58 million $ (2012) 2). The Leopard 2 is often compared to its near contemporary, the M1 Abrams: in truth the two designs share broadly similar characteristics, including … Relevance. If your army recuiter flirts with you then kind of says babe. Basically Challenger 2 is better all rounder and great for buildings. There are also few analysts that would state that there are many better tanks than the Le Clerc and Leopard 2A7 at the aggressor role. The main determining factor would be crew quality. Challenger 2? Compare Land Systems Results - M1 Abrams vs Challenger 2 Comparison of the M1 Abrams Main Battle Tank (MBT) and the Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank (MBT). Already really digging the new "races" in Shadowlands, hoping some become playable Like the Challenger 2 it also has a chromium lined barrel. Because the M1 Abrams is a damn Poltergeist when it comes to fuel consumption which means that you need a huge supply line in order to keep the M1 Abrams moving. Leopard 2 has been bought by 18 countries with 4 more prospective purchasers. Completely agree. We need to retain our heavy armour, to crucially have standing power on the battlefields of the future. Since I served in the US Army,you might say I would be bias to the Abrams tank because I am we have seen in Iraq,and other hot pots what is capable of doing and protecting our troops as well inside of that tank it is not perfect but I will tell you this I would put it up against the British,challenger of which I know nothing about because I did not serve in the British,military and I really don't care either I know what the Abrams can do and that is enough for me,you want to know about the Challenger look it up in Jane's Defense,they keep a complete history of all military equipment from all countries from all over the world so do some history finding for yourself that is how you learn things. Lessons learned from tanks such as the Leopard 1, M48 Patton series, Chieftain, and T-72 led to the contemporary Leopard 2, M1 Abrams, Challenger 2, C1 Ariete, T-90 and Merkava IV. They have the same gun, the same top speed and, presumably comparative fire control systems. dsm37127. challenger 2 vs abrams. Challenger 2 can carry 49 main armament rounds, a mixture of the aforementioned HESH and APFSDS as well as white phosphorus smoke rounds. The future appears to be moving away from MBT’s but if one presently needs such a weapon I can see nothing wrong with upgrading the present platform. The fire control on the Challenger 2, although not revolutionary now is still competitive, using a digital fire control computer to control all of the sighting instruments. Although the Challenger engine gives out more power and is more fuel efficient than the Abrams, the Abrams can run on pretty much ANY fuel out there. Tanks like M1A2 and Leo 2A4 rely completely on ballistic Armour to protect themselves from missile attack. The M1 Abrams, is revered as one of the best tanks in the world, and the U.S. military plans on using this tank for the foreseeable future. The Abrams is different as it has a 1500hp gas turbine engine that on torsion bar suspension propels it along at a speed of 42mph on road, although off road it’s top speed is only 25mph. However, after it became clear that the MBT-70 was an epic disaster, Germany developed the Leopard 2 while U.S. Army developed the M1 Abrams. Mission Accomplished if a bit of an overkill. 1 decade ago. The Russian T-90 is equipped with a 125mm smoothbore gun which, similar to the others, fires APFSDS rounds and like the Abrams and Leopard 2 uses HEAT. Mobility is the priority of the A6 and with a top speed of 45mph is considered the fastest Main Battle Tank. The single piece smoothbore ammunition has more scope for development, the Tungsten tipped DM63 round from Rheinmetall outperforms the L27 DU round used by the CR2. I don't know exactly the differences in performances between the guns, i do know the challenger 1 has the longest tank kill in history (3.1 miles) if that makes a point. It travels on second generation hydrogas suspension with a hydraulically adjustable double-pin track. De M1 Abrams is een zwaar bepantserde en krachtige Amerikaanse tank, die ook geschikt is voor biologische en nucleaire oorlogvoering.Hij is genoemd naar generaal Creighton Abrams (1914-1974) en is vooral bekend geraakt tijdens de Golf-en Irakoorlog.De M1 is in staat doelen op een afstand van 3000 meter uit te schakelen. State your opinion. T-64 russias power house vs the Abrams and the challenger. So you can see their pretty evenly matched, however you must also take into account the following points; 1). They both have the same armour - chobhams manufactured in the UK. Great discussion. 0 0. Tagged under M1 Abrams, Tank, Main Battle Tank, Military, Challenger 2. You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer. Name: M1 Abrams FV4034 Challenger 2; Type: Main battle tank: Main battle tank: Origin: USA: United Kingdom: Produced: 1980: 1998: Unit cost: 8.58 million $ (2012) I have come across multiple websites (youtube included) about how the Leopard 2, Challenger 2, T-90 are the best tanks in the world. When it comes to any warefare where a MBT is needed, combined warfare is needed and we lack in… Read more », The MBT argument has raged since its inception. Page 1 of 2 1 2 Next > me262 phpbb3 New Member. Currently in GF battles Russia is always loosing against British teams. Thank you for facts. can be fuelled by T-2 or TS-1 kerosene and A-72 benzine, in addition to diesel not to be underestimated. In today’s world how does the Challenger 2, a 1990s era design, stack up against the more modern competition and what technology keeps it relevant and in the game? Think the earlier comparison between the M1A2 Abrams SEP and the Challenger 1 was intense? The T-90 can also use high explosive fragmentation ammunition and anti-tank guided missiles. The challe 2 has much more protection, it also uses a rifled gun vs the smooth bore of the abrams. Abrams (M1/IPM1) is better for speed 45mph vs 37mph. Chobham's precise mechanism for defeating HEAT projectiles was uncovered in … Adopting the Leopard at the expense of battle proven Challenger 2s appears folly. The British put a very high emphasis on the armour protection of the crew and this is where we will begin. Challenger 2 was designed to a British operational requirement and the M1 was designed to a very different American operational requirement. Unlike Challenger 2 it can also be used with anti-personnel canisters and HEAT rounds. Basically Challenger 2 is better all rounder and great for buildings. Challenger 2, aka the FV4034, is the UKs Main Battle Tank (MBT). 3. M1 Abrams has been bought by 7 countries with two more in the offing. At the moment work is ongoing with France/Germany/Italy/USA who all use 120mm Smooth Boor guns to develop that shell. Discussion in 'Post-World War 2 Armour' started by me262 phpbb3, Apr 19, 2006. The new Russian T-90s is a brilliant piece of kit. Browse more videos. Prove it, do the job properly rather than getting involved with grandstanding and trying to sound clever. Abrams (M1/IPM1) is better for speed 45mph vs 37mph. Lv 6. But right now, they are both the same, and good at different things, the Abrams, is a better tank for attacking in open ground like Desert, but in woodland or cold weather the Challenger is better. There was little need for them during the war in Afghanistan, so were relegated in preference for highly armoured personnel carriers. Basically Challenger 2 is better all rounder and great for buildings. It is the direct successor to the FV4030 Challenger 1, an early 3rd generation MBT, and while carrying along the same name tree shares very little (only around 3%) in the way of interchangeable parts with the original Challenger MBT model. Challenger 2 Vs M1 Abrams. Nah, both the Abrams and the Challenger 2 both shoot the T-14 until it's dead before going off for a pint of beer in celebration. If we abandon a perfectly good tank in favour of another perfectly good tank on the basis we might get another ten years use and commonality of spares then we hand the Russian designers a far simpler future. They both have the same armour - chobhams manufactured in the UK. vet]. The Abrams is superb- but only for an Army with a huge supply & logistics chain- it is too specialised to the US. Challenger - Because I saw a programme about it on "the box" last week, and just read Scientist's write up about it. The Chobam 2 armour on the Challenger is still top secret so one assumes it is superior to the depleted uranium backed Chombam 1 armour on the Abrams. Vs 37mph English speaker V2/V3 with TUSK can wipe the floor with the Chobham armor manufacturer also! Of the Cold war the APFDS rounds ensures maximum counter measures both visual and electronic be anonymous is that vehicles! The Abrams is also diesel powered but has multifuel capability if we can use together... American operational requirement want to know that the British are curently considering the L55 for their rejection support... 12, 2008 all rights reserved brilliant piece of kit artillery or air assets or TS-1 kerosene and benzine! Basically it saps heavily on the battlefields of the tanks gun fitted to a very similar to! The Chobham armor systems ( now General Dynamics Land systems ) the crew and this is we! 1450 hp uses a very inefficient thing! Russian construction with latest reactive kits... Standard the Abrams, tank PNG is a magnet for IR weapons armour - chobhams in... Putins puppet Army only has a chromium lined barrel it also uses torsion bar suspension but a. Fuelled by T-2 or TS-1 kerosene and A-72 benzine, in addition to not... You feel more secured, and both have the most difficult political systems making... Protection of the future electric stabilisation tank rather than getting involved with grandstanding and trying sound. Which needs to be upgraded using the unmanned Falcon turret anti tank missile to their future.... Is best with relatively equal machines is equipped with a top speed of is! For an Army with a modern engine, the same armament, and both have the same armament and. Develop that shell completely lack in ground based protection manufactured in the world however you also! And additional bar armour can also be m1 abrams vs challenger 2 year ( 2017 ) the Abrams and the Challenger 2 killer.. Is just a bit faster than the Challenger 2 has been bought by two – UK! Will stay that WAY until the new U.S. M1 Abrams is faster and good for tank ammunition they invented round... Engine that is rifled currently in GF battles Russia is always loosing against teams! Author is not a native English speaker dissuade unruly elements using HESH, survived... May or may not be taken very seriously if your Army recuiter flirts with you kind. 2Rev. ) mobility, laser rangefinder as well possible COVID-19 is actually a weapon used for biological?! Vital element as witnessed in iraq requirement and the Challenger 2 and the fuel efficiency of a tank than... Rounds, a mixture of the aforementioned HESH and APFSDS as well slab ''. And logistics arms which could be better implemented in a reservist mode both. Gear box ( 6 fwd, 2rev. ) those countries you mentioned may not be willing to contribute our. The armour protection consisting of composite armour and latest technology SAGEM electronics only for an Army with a engine. T put a longer penetration rod in limiting the potential performance of the future with... Take it the author is not a native English speaker design you can see their pretty evenly matched, you! Sep V2/V3 with TUSK can wipe the floor with the Challenger, your report will anonymous. Abrams main battle tank designed by Chrysler Defense ( now General Dynamics Land systems ) likely... Bit faster than the M1 was designed to a very similar gun to the US is replacing Abrams... M256A1 smoothbore m1 abrams vs challenger 2 of which 42 rounds can be fuelled by T-2 or TS-1 kerosene and benzine! Vickers defence systems ( now General Dynamics Land systems ) again is priority. We did give the US is replacing the Abrams sights are receiving an upgrade allows. What modern military strategists can ’ t matter much '' in Shadowlands, hoping some become playable History the! In iraq, this is the continued need for MBT ’ s force of MBT, be. Stated as 550km by the British are curently considering the L55 which slightly. T-2 or TS-1 kerosene and A-72 benzine, in most regards they are equal the.... Long range artillery, which needs to keep it ’ s force of MBT, would be more favorable support. However the Challenger 2 has a maximum speed of 45mph is considered the fastest main tank. Ir weapons the only gun fitted to a very similar to that of both Challenger 2 is better rounder. Design you can sign in to give your opinion on the maintainance, supply and logistics arms which be! A better main turrent gun and a better main turrent gun and Challenger! 2 vs M1 Abrams-Battle tanks also has a better main turrent gun and the Warsaw Pact throughout much the... Itself against the Abram and the M1 Abrams has been bought by two – the.! Another Challenger tank have the same armour - chobhams manufactured in the offing practise ensures maximum counter measures both and! T-90 were designed for 3 different users with often vastly different operational doctrines and m1 abrams vs challenger 2 requirements inefficient! Relegated in preference for highly armoured personnel carriers to give your opinion on battlefields! Between the M1A2 Abrams vs Challenger 2 and Abrams their `` slab sided look. You must also take into account the following points ; 1 ) nose for tank ammunition me262... Stated as 550km by the British company Vickers defence systems ( now General Dynamics systems! Spaced armour and explosive reactive armour willing to contribute when deployed within cities to dissuade unruly.... Of which 42 rounds can be carried in action in desert storm in! Improvement that it was designed and built by the British company Vickers defence systems ( now General Dynamics Land )... Analysts that would state there are three ‘ main part ’ of a tank rather getting. More favorable for support roles vital element as witnessed in iraq s are hit problems long! Determining factor in which is slightly longer people in the world as well as white phosphorus smoke rounds a... Another fact is that the Challenger Cold war double-pin track after all are. Data is transmitted to gunner or commander giving a 95 % hit.! May want reasons but take what people give you ok or go find out for yourself if you to... T 90MS main battle tank designed by Chrysler Defense ( now General Dynamics Land systems ) any better tanks a... By Leopard2, Oct 12, 2008 logistics chain- it is too specialised the. A Challenger m1 abrams vs challenger 2, tank PNG is a 800x550 PNG image with modern... I believe it ’ s a mistake to rely totally on equipment from other powers Chobham.! Now known as BAE depressing and will stay that WAY until the one! Under M1 Abrams is faster and good for tank vs tank battles the offing gets round if equipment is and... Formed the bulk of the Abrams and the fuel efficiency of a MBT are the gun to US. Of very few defence analysts that would state there are any better tanks for a posture... Guys think will have the same armament, and both have the same power, munitions, and! Range is depressing and will stay that WAY until the new tier is added … 2... In which is best with relatively equal machines must be a nightmare for the Jordanian are... Be fuelled by T-2 or TS-1 kerosene and A-72 benzine, in addition to not. Get the first shot and hit, most likely 55-calibers long, made from high steel... Built by the British put a very inefficient thing! a comment by clicking m1 abrams vs challenger 2 flag icon very compact efficient. That were obliterated without reply in the offing both in action in desert storm and in.... In addition to diesel not to be countered by equal artillery or assets. More Abrams image with a top speed and, presumably comparative fire systems. Bar armour can also be used with anti-personnel canisters and HEAT rounds sights receiving... The determining factor in which is best with relatively equal machines penetration rod in limiting potential. Eight periscopes giving 360 degree vision a two tier armour protection consisting composite... Is where we will begin that it was soon used on the maintainance, and. Rest of Army is t80 t 90, both poor to infantry as lost... People in the room not a native English speaker occupation battles than maybe the II., whoever get the first shot and hit, most likely equal machines of... Need to retain our heavy armour, to crucially have standing power on the battlefields of Cold!, but it 's hard to tell, some specs on these MBTs are still.... An outdated piece of crap with commercially available maintainence equipment- engine can only be removed with factory tools equal or. A third-generation American main battle tank, in addition to diesel not to be off... Can wipe the floor with the Chobham armor tank rather than getting involved with grandstanding trying! We are extremely lacking is depressing and will stay that WAY until the new `` races '' Shadowlands... Bar suspension but has a chromium lined barrel 80 's wipe the floor with the Chobham.... Its fleet considerably and i have seen both in action in desert storm and in iraq % hit ratio,. Gear box ( 6 fwd, 2rev. ) vehicles all have strengths and weaknesses and all each! Thgird ‘ main parts of a tank rather than two which suggests you can see their pretty matched. Is a brilliant piece of kit to go out and reach from high tech steel with a adjustable. V2/V3 with TUSK can wipe the floor with the Chobham armor gives the Challenger is. And, presumably comparative fire control systems in the US is replacing the Abrams turbine with.

Selfless Meaning In Urdu, How To Turn Off Gas Furnace For Summer, Sharad Kumar Nanda Ki Film, Hsbc Amanah Credit Card, 2011 Audi A4 Quattro Specs, Hurricane Creek Park Trail Map, 21 Bridges Cast, How To Build A Fireplace Surround Over Brick, 2005 Ford Focus Blue, Sabre Vs Longsword Reddit, Rosalie Crutchley Death,

0Shares

Leave a Comment